• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Saterfrisian
  • Afrikaans
Show all
33.5.2.Absolute zonder-construction
quickinfo

The absolute zonder-construction seems to be more limited than the absolute met-construction: it seems to be possible only with locational adpositional phrases and intransitive prepositions. We have placed the construction in sentence-initial position (i.e. before the finite verb in second position) in order to show that the construction functions as a clausal constituent.

133
a. Zonder bril op zijn neus ziet hij er jonger uit.
  without glasses on his nose looks he there younger uit
  'Without glasses on his nose, he looks much younger.'
b. Zonder laken over de tafel heen is het ongezellig.
  without cloth over the table heen is it not.cozy
  'It isnʼt cozy without a cloth on the table.'
c. Zonder das om mag je de club niet in.
  without tie around may you the club not into
  'One isnʼt allowed to enter the club without a tie around (the neck).'

Directional adpositional phrases like (134a), and predicates of other categories do not seem to be possible. Given examples such as without the chairman present, we cannot start the meeting, English seems to be more permissive in this respect.

134
a. ?? Zonder kind het huis uit hebben we hier te weinig ruimte.
  without child the house out have we here too little space
  Intended: 'Without a child leaving the house, we do not have enough space.'
b. ?? Zonder iemand ziek zullen we zeker winnen.
  without someone ill will we certainly win
  Intended: 'Without anyone ill, we will surely win.'
c. ?? Zonder iemand als voorzitter kunnen we niet beginnen.
  without someone as chairman can we not start
  'Without someone as chair, we cannot get started.'
d. ?? Zonder iemand achtervolgd door de politie kan ons niets gebeuren.
  without someone chased by the police can us nothing happen
  'Without someone being chased by the police, nothing can happen to us.'

A potential problem for the claim that predicative als-phrases like als voorzitter in (134c) cannot be used as the predicative part of the absolute zonder-construction is that Haeseryn (1997: 929) gives example (135a) as grammatical. However, it is not entirely clear whether this is really an absolute zonder-construction, because example (136a) below indicates that proper nouns do not give rise to fully acceptable results in this construction. Perhaps, the als-phrase must be seen as a modifier of the proper noun. That this is a possibility is shown in (135b). Since we have no further insights to offer, we leave the analysis of this example to future research.

135
a. Zonder Hannelore als raadsvrouwe is zij nergens.
  without Hannelore as counselor is she nowhere
  'Without Hannelore as a counselor, she is lost.'
b. Een advocate als raadsvrouwe is zeer nuttig.
  a lawyer as counselor is very useful

Not only is there a restriction on the type of predicate, there also seems to be a restriction on the nominal part of the construction, with judgments varying from person to person. For at least some speakers, the examples in (136a-d) with proper nouns, referential personal pronouns, definite noun phrases, and interrogative phrases all seem to produce a marked result; to a lesser extent, the same thing seems to hold for universally quantified noun phrases, as in (136e).

136
a. % Zonder Jan in het doel kunnen we niet winnen.
proper noun
  without Jan in the goal can we not win
  'Without Jan in the goal we cannot win.'
b. % Zonder hem in het doel ...
referential personal pronoun
  without him in the goal
c. % Zonder de keeper in het doel ...
definite NP
  without the goalkeeper in the goal
d. % Zonder wie in het doel ...?
interrogative phrase
  without whom in the goal
e. % [Zonder alle spelers in het doel] ...
universally quantified NP
  without all players in the goal

Demonstrative and indefinite noun phrases, on the other hand, are fully acceptable, as shown in (137a-b). Surprisingly, absolute zonder-constructions differ from absolute met-constructions in that they allow, and indeed typically occur, with bare singular noun phrases (i.e. without a determiner) as their nominal part; compare (137c) with (101g).

137
a. Zonder die keeper in het doel ...
demonstrative NP
  without that goalkeeper in the goal
b. Zonder een goede keeper/?iemand in het doel ...
existentially quantified NP
  without a good goalkeeper/someone in the goal
c. Zonder goede keeper in het doel ...
bare NP
  without good goalkeeper in the goal

Finally, it should be noted that zonder licenses negative polarity items like ook maar (iets)any(thing) or een centa single penny. This is illustrated in (138).

138
a. Zonder ook maar één bloemetje in huis vierde hij zijn jubileum.
  without ook maar one bouquet in house celebrated he his jubilee
  'He celebrated his jubilee without having a single bouquet in his house.'
b. Zonder een cent op zak trok hij de wijde wereld in.
  without a cent on pocket traveled he the wide world into
  'Without a single penny in his pocket he went out into the world.'
readmore
References:
    report errorprintcite