• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Saterfrisian
  • Afrikaans
Show all
36.6. Bibliographical notes
quickinfo

The discussion of R-pronominalization and R-extraction in this chapter is mainly based on the seminal PhD theses of Van Riemsdijk (1978), Bennis (1986), as well as a lesser-known paper (in Dutch) on the distribution of er by Huybregts (1991). Other important works with relevant discussions are Bech (1952), Coppen (1991), Geerts (1984), Beeken (1993), Odijk (1993), Zwart (1993), Barbiers (1995a), Zwarts (1997a), Haeseryn et al. (1997), and Visser (2002). Quantitative and expletive er are discussed in more detail in Sections N19.3 and N21.1.2. The data on the co-occurrence and conflation of the various types of R-words in Section 36.5 (the appendix) are complex, and it is sometimes difficult for native speakers to supply their judgments on the examples discussed; not surprisingly, conflicting judgments can be found in the literature, and that it is virtually impossible to provide an exhaustive review of this topic. For this reason, it is recommended that readers interested in exploring these issues in more detail also consult the usual references, like (1952), Van Riemsdijk (1978), Bennis (1980/1986), Huybregts (1991), and Odijk (1993:§6/1994).

References

  • Barbiers, Sjef. 1995a. The syntax of interpretation. Leiden University/HIL: PhD thesis.
  • Bech, Gunnar. 1952. Über das niederländische Adverbialpronomen er. Traveaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague VIII, Copenhague/Amsterdam.
  • Beeken, J. 1993. Spiegelstructuur en variabiliteit: pre- en postposities in het Nederlands. Leuven: Peeters.
  • Bennis, Hans. 1980. Er-deletion in a modular grammar. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1980, eds. Saskia Daalder and M. Gerritsen. Amsterdam/Oxford/New York: North-Holland.
  • Bennis, Hans. 1986. Gaps and dummies. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
  • Broekhuis, Hans. 2008. Derivations and evaluations: object shift in the Germanic languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Coppen, Peter-Arno. 1991. Specifying the noun phrase. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
  • Corver, Norbert. 2006b. Freezing effects. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume II, eds. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 383-406. Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Corver, Norbert. 2017. Freezing effects. In The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax [2nd, revised edition], eds. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 1711-1743. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Corver, Norbert. 2022b. Generatieve syntaxis van het Nederlands: Standen van zaken & een casusstudie. Nederlandse Taalkunde/Dutch Linguistics 27: 35-74.
  • Geerts, Guido et al. 1984. Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst first edition. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
  • Haeseryn, Walter et al. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst, 2nd, revised edition. Groningen: Nijhoff.
  • Haider, Hubert, Susan Olsen & Sten Vikner. 1995. Introduction. In Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, eds. Hubert Haider et al., 1-45. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Hoekstra, Teun. 1979. The freezing principle and stranded prepositions. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1977-1979, eds. Wim Zonneveld and Fred Weerman, 321-335. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
  • Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. MIT: PhD thesis.
  • Huybregts, Riny. 1991. Clitics. In Grammatische analyse, ed. Jan Model, 279-330. Dordrecht: ICG Printing.
  • Klooster, Wim. 1989. Bananenzinnen. In Liber amicorium Kåre Langvik-Johanessen, eds. Karel Porteman and Kurt Erich Schöndorf, 35-43. Leuven.
  • Klooster, Wim. 2001a. Grammatica van het hedendaags Nederlands. Een volledig overzicht. Den Haag: SDU Uitgeverij.
  • Koeneman, Olaf. 2000. The flexible nature of verb movement. Utrecht University: PhD thesis.
  • Koster, Jan. 1978a. Locality principles in syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
  • Neeleman, Ad & Hans Van de Koot. 2017. Syntactic Haplology. In The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax [2nd, revised edition], eds. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 4377-4407. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Odijk, J. 1993. Compositionality and syntactic generalizations. Tilburg University: PhD thesis.
  • Odijk, Jan 1994. Bech's problem. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1994, eds. Reineke Bok-Bennema and Crit Cremers, 139-149. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Ruys, Eddy G. 2005. Weak and weaker prepositional complements. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 2005, eds. Jenny Doetjes and Jeroen Van de Weijer, 151-163. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Ruys, Eddy G. 2008. Stranding, weak pronouns, and the fine structure of the middle field. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26: 547-587.
  • Van der Horst, Joop. 2008. Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis, Vols. 1 & 2. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.
  • Van der Horst, Joop & Kees van der Horst. 1999. Geschiedenis van het Nederlands in de twintigste eeuw. Den Haag/Antwerpen: SDU Uitgevers & Standaard Uitgeverij.
  • Van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1978. A case study in syntactic markedness: the binding nature of prepositional phrases. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.
  • Visser, Mario. 2002. On er. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 2002, eds. Hans Broekhuis and Paula Fikkert, 175-185. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1993. Dutch syntax. A minimalist approach. University of Groningen: PhD thesis.
  • Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2011. The syntax of Dutch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zwarts, Joost. 1997a. Complex prepositions and P-stranding. Linguistics 35: 1091-1112.
  • readmore
    References:
      report errorprintcite