• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Saterfrisian
  • Afrikaans
Show all
31.3.4.The partitive genitive construction
quickinfo

This section discusses the partitive genitive use of participles and modal infinitives. The previous sections have amply demonstrated that a distinction should be made between verbal and truly adjectival participles/modal infinitives, and that participles and modal infinitives can only be used in predicative position if they are truly adjectival. Section 29.2.3 has shown that partitive genitive adjectives are a subset of the adjectives that can be used predicatively; cf. the observational generalization from Section 29.2.3, repeated here as (158) and (159).

158
Adjectives in the partitive genitive construction:
The set of partitive genitive adjectives is a proper subset of the adjectives that can be used as predicative complements.
159
Predicatively used adjectives that do not occur as partitive genitives include:
a. adjectives that can only be predicated of [+animate] noun phrases;
b. adjectives that take a proposition as their logical subject;
c. adjectives that take weather het as their logical subject;
d. adjectives that take a nominal complement;
e. superlatives;
f. adjectives ending in /a/, /o/, /i/, /e/, /y/ or /ə/.

Consequently, we predict that only truly adjectival participles/modal infinitives can enter into a partitive genitive construction. This section will show that this prediction is borne out, although the partitive genitive construction is much more restricted than one might expect from the generalizations in (158) and (159).

readmore
[+]  I.  Past/passive participles

Section 31.3 has shown that only past/passive participles of transitive, unaccusative and object experiencer psych-verbs can be used in predicative position. The generalization in (158) consequently limits the set of possible candidates for the partitive genitive construction to (a subset of) these verbs. The examples in (160) to (162), however, show that past/passive participles do not normally seem to occur in the partitive genitive construction at all, although some speakers seem to marginally accept the transitive examples in (160a&c).

160
a. % iets gekookts
  something cooked
b. * iets besprokens
transitive
  something discussed
c. % iets gestolens
  something stolen
d. * iets gelezens
  something read
161
a. * iets gekrompens
  something shrunk
b. * iets gevallens
unaccusative
  something fallen
162
a. * iets opgewondens
  something excited
b. * iets overtuigds
psych-verbs
  something convinced
c. * iets verontrusts
  something upset

We need not be surprised about the unacceptability of the examples with object experiencer psych-verbs in (162): truly adjectival participles of psychological verbs are predicated only of [+human] entities (cf. the primed examples in (122)), and these examples are therefore excluded by clause (159a). Since this does not hold for the examples in (160) and (161), the reason for their degraded status remains a mystery. Note that when the participle is prefixed with on-, which is only possible when we are dealing with true adjectives, the result improves, but is still not very good; the primed examples are added to show that these prefixed participles can be used in copular constructions.

163
a. (?) iets ongekookts
 
a'. Het ei bleek nog ongekookt.
  the egg turned.out still un-boiled
b. *? iets onbesprokens
 
b'. Dit onderwerp bleef onbesproken.
  this topic remained un-discussed
c. *? iets ongelezens
 
c'. Het boek bleef ongelezen.
  the book remained unread

For completeness, the examples in (164) show that pseudo-participles can be used in partitive genitive constructions.

164
a. iets bekends
  something well-known
b. iets gekleurds
  something colored
c. iets geschikts
  something suitable
[+]  II.  Present participles

The generalization in (158) correctly predicts that the present participles of object experiencer psych-verbs can also be felicitously used in the partitive genitive; this is shown in the primed examples in (165).

[+]  A.  Object experiencer psych-verbs

The generalization in (158) correctly predicts that the present participles of object experiencer psych-verbs can also be used felicitously in the partitive genitive; this is shown in the primed examples in (165).

165
a. Zijn avontuur was heel opwindend.
  his adventure was very exciting
a'. iets opwindends
  something exciting
b. Die mededeling was heel verontrustend.
  that announcement was very disturbing
b'. iets verontrustends
  something disturbing
c. Zijn argumenten zijn erg overtuigend.
  his arguments are very convincing
c'. iets overtuigends
  something convincing

Section 31.3.1, sub II, has shown that the present participles of psych-verbs like irriterento irritate and interesserento interest cannot be used predicatively; they are blocked in this context by the existence of genuine adjectives like irritantirritating and interessantinteresting. The same can be observed in the partitive genitive constructions in (166).

166
Present participles
Adjectives
a. ?? iets irriterends
  something annoying
a'. iets irritants
  something annoying
b. * iets interesserends
  something interesting
b'. iets interessants
  something interesting
c. ?? iets bekorends
  something beguiling
c'. iets bekoorlijks
  something beguiling
[+]  B.  Present participles of unaccusative verbs ending in ‑e

The primeless examples of (167) show again that the present participles of a limited number of unaccusative verbs can be used predicatively, provided that they are affixed with the ending -e; such cases are exceptional, since predicatively used adjectives are usually not inflected; cf. Section 31.3.1, sub IIB. The primed examples show that partitive genitive use of these present participles is also possible; note that the -e ending is missing in these cases.

167
a. Het schip is zinkende.
  the ship is sinking
a'. iets zinkends/*zinkendes
  something sinking
b. Het verzet is groeiende.
  the resistance is growing
b'. iets groeiends/*groeiendes
  something growing
[+]  C.  Unaccusative motion verbs

Another subset of the unaccusative verbs that allow predicative use of their present participle are the motion verbs; cf. (168). However, since these present participles are always predicated of [+human] entities, generalization (158a) correctly predicts that they cannot be used in partitive genitive constructions.

168
a. De jongen bleek lopend.
  the boy turned.out walking
a'. * iets lopends
  something walking
b. Het meisje bleek liftend.
  the girl turned.out hitchhiking
b'. * iets liftends
  something hitchhiking
[+]  D.  Problematic cases

This subsection concludes with a number of problematic cases for the generalization in (158), according to which the set of adjectives that can enter the partitive genitive construction is a proper subset of the set of adjectives that can be used as predicative complements. The (a)-examples in (169) involve intransitive motion verbs, the (b) and (c)-examples involve verbs expressing the transmission of sound and light respectively, and the (d)-examples involve verbs denoting certain natural processes. In all cases, the partitive genitive constructions in the primeless examples are at least marginally acceptable, while the corresponding copular constructions in the primed examples are severely degraded.

169
a. ? iets bewegends/wapperends/vliegends
  something moving/waving/flying
a'. * Het gordijn is bewegend./De vlag is wapperend./Het toestel is vliegend.
  the curtain is moving/the flag is waving/the machine is flying
b. iets zoemends/ruisends
  something buzzing/rustling
b'. * De wekker is zoemend./De bladeren zijn ruisend.
  the alarm.clock is buzzing/the leaves are rustling
c. ? iets flikkerends/glinsterends
  something flashing/glittering
c'. * De lamp is flikkerend/Het glas is glinsterend.
  the lamp is flickering/the glass is glittering
d. ? iets rottends/bloeiends
  something rotting/flowering
d'. * Die appel is rottend./Die boom is bloeiend.
  that apple is rotting/that tree is flowering

The verbs in (169) do not take an object but differ from normal intransitive verbs in that their subject can be inanimate and that impersonal passivization yields a degraded result. For this reason, it has been suggested that these verbs form a special unaccusativity type, which differs from the more familiar type in that its members select the perfect auxiliary hebben; cf. Section V2.1 for discussion. The question as to why the primeless examples in (169) are acceptable must be left to future research.

[+]  III.  Modal infinitives

Section 31.3.1, sub III, has demonstrated that modal infinitives of transitive verbs can be used in the copular construction in their ability reading. The generalization in (158) therefore predicts that truly adjectival predicatively used modal infinitives can be used in the partitive genitive construction: however, the primed examples in (170) show that this prediction is incorrect. As in the case of the past/passive participles in Subsection I, there is no obvious explanation for the unacceptability of the partitive genitive constructions.

170
a. Dat boek is gemakkelijk te lezen.
  that book is easily to read
  'This book is easily accessible.'
a'. * iets te lezens
  something to read
b. Deze afstand is gemakkelijk af te leggen.
  this distance is easily prt. to cover
  'This distance can be covered easily.'
b'. * iets af te leggens
  something prt. to cover
c. Dit probleem is gemakkelijk te begrijpen.
  this problem is easily to understand
  'This problem can be understood easily.'
c'. * iets te begrijpens
  something to understand
References:
    report errorprintcite