• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Saterfrisian
  • Afrikaans
Show all
26.4. Pronominalization of the adjective
quickinfo

Section 24.4 has shown that pronominalization of the adjective (phrase) is possible. In (181a) we repeat an example in which the pronoun hetit performs the same function as the full AP bang voor hondenafraid of dogs. In (181b), on the other hand, the pronoun only replaces the adjective bangafraid; the function of the PP-complement of the adjective is performed by the PP voor spinnenof spiders. If the adjective is modified by a degree modifier, pronominalization is also possible. However, Section 25.4 has shown that in some cases the addition of erg is necessary to license pronominalization of the adjective, while in other cases the addition of erg leads to unacceptability.

181
Jan is [AP bang voor honden] ...
  Jan is afraid of dogs ...
a. ... en ik ben het ook.
  ... and I am it too
b. ... en ik ben het voor spinnen.
  ... and I am it for spiders

If the adjective (phrase) is pronominalized, it is still possible to express comparison. This is shown in (182), where the comparative meaning is expressed by the adjectives meermore and minderless, which are also used in the periphrastic comparative construction. This possibility is remarkable because the majorative form of bang is banger and not *meer bang.

182
a. Jan is vreselijk bang voor honden, maar ik ben het nog meer (*erg).
  Jan is terribly afraid of dogs but I am it even more much
  'Jan is terribly afraid of dogs, but I am even more so.'
b. Jan is niet erg bang voor honden, maar ik ben het nog minder (*erg).
  Jan is not very afraid of dogs but I am it even less much
  'Jan is not very afraid of dogs, but I am even less so.'

The examples in (182) also show that the addition of erg is not allowed, although (182a) alternates with (183), which uses the comparative form ergerworse.

183
Jan is vreselijk bang voor honden, maar ik ben het nog erger.
  Jan is terribly afraid of dogs but I am it even worse
'Jan is terribly afraid of dogs, but I am even more so.'

The examples in (184a&b) provide comparable cases where the superlative is expressed by het meestthe most and het minstthe least. These elements are also used in the periphrastic superlative construction, despite the fact that the maximative of bang is the morphologically complex form bangst.

184
a. Iedereen is vreselijk bang voor honden, maar ik ben het het meest (*erg).
  everyone is terribly afraid of dogs but I am it the most much
  'Everyone is terribly afraid of dogs, but I am the most so.'
b. Niemand is erg bang voor honden, maar ik ben het het minst (?erg).
  no one is very afraid of dogs but I am it the least much
  'No one is very afraid of dogs, but I am the least so.'

The addition of erg is again impossible, although (184a) alternates with (185), in which the superlative form het ergstthe worst is used. Note that for some reason (184b) yields a better result with erg than (182b); cases such as (184b) are also easy to find on the internet.

185
Iedereen is vreselijk bang voor honden, maar ik ben het het ergst.
  everyone is terribly afraid of dogs but I am it the worst
'Everyone is terribly afraid of dogs, but I am the most so.'

The equative degree differs from the comparative and superlative degrees in that evenas must be followed by erg, as in the case of the modifiers tetoo, zoso and hoehow. The fact that erg does not occur in non-pronominal APs modified by even (*even erg bang) shows that erg is not a degree modifier in (186), but is needed to license the pronominalization of the AP.

186
Jan is ontzettend bang voor honden en ik ben het even *(erg).
  Jan is terribly afraid of dogs and I am it as much
'Jan is very afraid of dogs, and I am as much so.'
readmore
References:
    report errorprintcite