• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Saterfrisian
  • Afrikaans
Show all
8.6.Bibliographical notes
quickinfo

Adverbs/adverbials have figured prominently in the semantic literature, but until recently they have received relatively little attention in the syntactic literature. The discussion in this chapter takes as its starting point the division between clause adverbials and VP adverbials in Jackendoff (1972); cf. also e.g. Kraak & Klooster (1968: §9), Van den Hoek (1972), and Barbiers (2018). The semantic subdivision of these two main groups described in Section 8.2 more or less follows the divisions found in Quirk et al. (1985/1991) and Huddleston & Pullum (2002). Although we differ from Haeseryn et al. (1997) in that we deny the existence of a separate syntactic category (i.e. word class) of adverbs, this work has provided a solid empirical basis for our discussion of the categorial form of adverbial phrases in Section 8.3. Although the linear order of adverbial phrases has received attention in the generative literature since Van den Hoek (1972) and Koster (1974), this has not led to greater insight into the nature of the constraints that determine this order. The issue was put firmly on the research agenda with the publication of Cinque (1999/2006) and Schweikert (2005), which claimed (for all languages) that adverbials are base-generated in fixed structural positions in the clause: cf. Thráinsson (2007: §2.1.6) for a discussion of the Scandinavian languages that may be very helpful for further investigation of Dutch in this respect. The syntactic approach was soon challenged in Ernst (2002), which claims that the distribution of adverbials is essentially determined by semantic factors. The debate, which is still ongoing, has revived interest in the distributional aspects of adverbials, as can be seen from the articles collected by Artemis Alexiadou in Lingua 114/6 (theme issue: Adverbs across frameworks), which reviews a number of selected approaches to the topic. More general introductions to the literature on adverbs and adverbial phrases can be found in Delfitto (2006) and Maienborn & Schäfer (2011), and Delfitto & Fiorin (2017).

References

  • Barbiers, Sjef. 2018. Adverbs in strange places: on the syntax of adverbs in Dutch. Nederlandse Taalkunde/Dutch Linguistics 23: 57-87.
  • Broekhuis, Hans. 2008. Derivations and evaluations: object shift in the Germanic languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Broekhuis, Hans. 2011. A typology of clause structure. In Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2010, eds. Jeroen van Craenenbroeck and Johan Rooryck, 1-31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Broekhuis, Hans. 2023. VO or OV: V to v or not to v. Linguistic Variation 23: 343-378.
  • Broekhuis, Hans & Henk Verkuyl. 2014. Binary tense and modality. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32: 973-1009.
  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: a cross-linguistic perspective. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 2003. Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua 114: 638-710.
  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006. Complement and adverbial PPs: implications for clause structure. In Restructuring and Functional Heads, 145-166. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Delfitto, Denis. 2006. Adverb classes and adverb placement. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume I, eds. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 83-120. Malden (MA)/Oxford (UK): Blackwell Publishing.
  • Delfitto, Denis & Gaetano Fiorin. 2017. Adverb classes and adverb placement. In The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax [2nd, revised edition], eds. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 140-168. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Diepeveen, Ariane. 2012. Modifying words. Dutch adverbial morphology in contrast. Freien Universität Berlin: PhD thesis.
  • Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge (UK)/New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Haeseryn, Walter et al. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst, 2nd, revised edition. Groningen: Nijhoff.
  • Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum (eds). 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Janssen, Theo. 1983. Het temporele systeem van het Nederlands:drie tijden en twee tijdscomposities. Glot 6: 45-104.
  • Klein, Henny. 1997. Adverbs of degree in Dutch. University of Groningen: PhD thesis.
  • Koster, Jan. 1974. Het werkwoord als spiegelcentrum. Spektator 3: 601-618.
  • Kraak, Albert & Wim Klooster. 1972. Syntaxis, 2nd edition. Culemborg: Stam/Robijns.
  • Maienborn, Claudia & Martin Schäfer. 2011. Adverbs and adverbials. In Semantics. an international handbook of natural language meaning, volume 2, eds. Klaus von Heusinger et al., 1390-1420. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter/Mouton.
  • Palmer, F.R. 2001. Mood and modality, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Quirk, Randolph et al. 1979. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
  • Quirk, Randolph et al. 1985/1991. A comprehensive grammar of the English language, 9th revised impression. London/New York: Longman.
  • Schweikert, Walter. 2005. The order of prepositional phrases in the structure of the clause. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Te Winkel, Lamert Allard. 1866. Over de wijzen en tijden der werkwoorden. De Taalgids 8: 66-75.
  • Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Van den Hoek, Theo. 1972. Woordvolgorde en konstituentenstruktuur. Spektator 1: 125-136.
  • Verkuyl, Henk J. 2008. Binary tense. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
  • Vliegen, Maurice. 2011. Evidentiality. Dutch seem and appear verbs: blijken, lijken, schijnen. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 2011, eds. Rick Nouwen and Marion Elenbaas, 125-137. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2011. The syntax of Dutch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • readmore
    References:
      report errorprintcite