• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Saterfrisian
  • Afrikaans
Show all
19.2.2.5.Differences between possessive pronouns and possessive van-PPs
quickinfo

We have seen in several places that possessive pronouns and prenominal possessive noun phrases can alternate with postnominal van-PPs; we illustrate this again in (497). This section concludes our discussion of possessive pronouns by pointing out some differences between prenominal possessors and postnominal PPs.

497
a. Jans/zijn boek
  Jan’s/his book
b. het boek van Jan/hem
  the book of Jan/him

A first difference concerns the use of possessive pronouns in questions like (498). In the discussion of example (452) in Section 19.2.2.1 it was already pointed out that the use of the interrogative possessives wiens/wierwhose is rather formal. The colloquial way to ask the intended question is with a possessive van-PP, as in (498a'). The questions in (498) may evoke an elliptical answer, involving only the possessor. However, the (b)-examples show that using a possessive pronoun or genitive noun phrase leads to a degraded result; the more formal question in (498a) is also answered by the van-PP in (498b').

498
a. Wiens/Wier boek is dit?
  whosemasc/fem. book is this
a'. Van wie is dit boek?
  of whom is this book
b. *? Jans/zijn.
  Jan’s/his
b'. Van Jan/hem.
  of Jan/him

Similar contrasts can be found in other elliptical contexts, such as those in (499).

499
a. ?? Zij heeft zijn/Jans boek gelezen en hij haar/Maries.
  she has his/Jan’s book read en he her/Marie’s
  'She read her/Jan's book, and he her/Marieʼs.'
b. Zij heeft het boek van hem/Jan gelezen en hij dat van haar/Marie.
  she has the book of him/Jan read and he that of her/Marie

The second difference concerns the form of the pronoun: example (500) shows that while the possessive pronoun can be either weak or strong, using a weak pronoun as the complement of the preposition van produces a marginal result.

500
a. mijn/m’n boek
  my book
b. het boek van mij/??me
  the book of me

However, the use of a weak pronoun is possible if we replace the definite article with the distal demonstrative dat: dat boek van methat book of mine, provided that the noun phrase is interpreted as referring to an entity familiar to the hearer; Section 19.2.3.2, sub IIB, discusses this particular construction in more detail.

A third difference concerns the use of the possessor in predicative post-copular position: the examples in (501) show that this is excluded with possessive pronouns and genitive noun phrases but possible with van-PPs.

501
a. *? Het boek is mijn/Jans.
  the book is my/Jan’s
b. Het boek is van mij/Jan.
  the book is of me/Jan

The examples in (502) illustrate a final difference: while the coordination of possessive pronouns and/or genitive noun phrases leads to a marked result, the coordination of pronouns and noun phrases within the van-PP is easily possible.

502
a. ?? jouw en haar boek
  your and her book
a'. * Peters en jouw boek
  Peter’s and your book
b. het boek van jou en haar
  the book of you and her
b'. het boek van Peter en jou
  the book of Peter and you

Finally, note that the differences between the possessive pronouns and the postnominal van-PP containing a personal pronoun correspond exactly to those between the strong and weak possessive pronouns discussed by Cardinaletti (1998); cf. Alexiadou et al. (2007:569-70) for a brief discussion of the relevant Italian data.

readmore
References:
    report errorprintcite