/ instituut voor de Nederlandse taal / Taalportaal
- Dutch
- Frisian
- Saterfrisian
- Afrikaans
Show all
-
- Syntax
- Preface and acknowledgements
- Verbs and Verb Phrases
- 1 Characterization and classification
- 2 Projection of verb phrases I:Argument structure
- 3 Projection of verb phrases II:Verb frame alternations
- Introduction
- 3.1. Main types
- 3.2. Alternations involving the external argument
- 3.3. Alternations of noun phrases and PPs
- 3.3.1. Dative/PP alternations (dative shift)
- 3.3.1.1. Dative alternation with aan-phrases (recipients)
- 3.3.1.2. Dative alternation with naar-phrases (goals)
- 3.3.1.3. Dative alternation with van-phrases (sources)
- 3.3.1.4. Dative alternation with bij-phrases (possessors)
- 3.3.1.5. Dative alternation with voor-phrases (benefactives)
- 3.3.1.6. Conclusion
- 3.3.1.7. Bibliographical notes
- 3.3.2. Accusative/PP alternations
- 3.3.3. Nominative/PP alternations
- 3.3.1. Dative/PP alternations (dative shift)
- 3.4. Some apparent cases of verb frame alternation
- 3.5. Bibliographical notes
- 4 Projection of verb phrases IIIa:Selection of clauses/verb phrases
- 5 Projection of verb phrases IIIb:Argument and complementive clauses
- Introduction
- 5.1. Finite argument clauses
- 5.2. Infinitival argument clauses
- 5.3. Complementive clauses
- 6 Projection of verb phrases IIIc:Complements of non-main verbs
- 7 Projection of verb phrases IIId:Verb clusters
- 8 Projection of verb phrases IV: Adverbial modification
- 9 Word order in the clause I:General introduction
- 10 Word order in the clause II:Position of the finite verb (verb-first/second)
- 11 Word order in the clause III:Clause-initial position (wh-movement)
- Introduction
- 11.1. The formation of V1- and V2-clauses
- 11.2. Clause-initial position remains (phonetically) empty
- 11.3. Clause-initial position is filled
- 12 Word order in the clause IV:Postverbal field (extraposition)
- 13 Word order in the clause V: Middle field (scrambling)
- 14 Main-clause external elements
- Nouns and Noun Phrases
- 1 Characterization and classification
- 2 Projection of noun phrases I: complementation
- Introduction
- 2.1. General observations
- 2.2. Prepositional and nominal complements
- 2.3. Clausal complements
- 2.4. Bibliographical notes
- 3 Projection of noun phrases II: modification
- Introduction
- 3.1. Restrictive and non-restrictive modifiers
- 3.2. Premodification
- 3.3. Postmodification
- 3.3.1. Adpositional phrases
- 3.3.2. Relative clauses
- 3.3.3. Infinitival clauses
- 3.3.4. A special case: clauses referring to a proposition
- 3.3.5. Adjectival phrases
- 3.3.6. Adverbial postmodification
- 3.4. Bibliographical notes
- 4 Projection of noun phrases III: binominal constructions
- Introduction
- 4.1. Binominal constructions without a preposition
- 4.2. Binominal constructions with a preposition
- 4.3. Bibliographical notes
- 5 Determiners: articles and pronouns
- Introduction
- 5.1. Articles
- 5.2. Pronouns
- 5.3. Bibliographical notes
- 6 Numerals and quantifiers
- 7 Pre-determiners
- Introduction
- 7.1. The universal quantifier al 'all' and its alternants
- 7.2. The pre-determiner heel 'all/whole'
- 7.3. A note on focus particles
- 7.4. Bibliographical notes
- 8 Syntactic uses of noun phrases
- Adjectives and Adjective Phrases
- 1 Characteristics and classification
- 2 Projection of adjective phrases I: Complementation
- 3 Projection of adjective phrases II: Modification
- 4 Projection of adjective phrases III: Comparison
- 5 Attributive use of the adjective phrase
- 6 Predicative use of the adjective phrase
- 7 The partitive genitive construction
- 8 Adverbial use of the adjective phrase
- 9 Participles and infinitives: their adjectival use
- 10 Special constructions
- Adpositions and adpositional phrases
- 1 Characteristics and classification
- Introduction
- 1.1. Characterization of the category adposition
- 1.2. A formal classification of adpositional phrases
- 1.3. A semantic classification of adpositional phrases
- 1.3.1. Spatial adpositions
- 1.3.2. Temporal adpositions
- 1.3.3. Non-spatial/temporal prepositions
- 1.4. Borderline cases
- 1.5. Bibliographical notes
- 2 Projection of adpositional phrases: Complementation
- 3 Projection of adpositional phrases: Modification
- 4 Syntactic uses of the adpositional phrase
- 5 R-pronominalization and R-words
- 1 Characteristics and classification
- Coordination and Ellipsis
- Nouns and noun phrases (JANUARI 2025)
- 15 Characterization and classification
- 16 Projection of noun phrases I: Complementation
- 16.0. Introduction
- 16.1. General observations
- 16.2. Prepositional and nominal complements
- 16.3. Clausal complements
- 16.4. Bibliographical notes
- 17 Projection of noun phrases II: Modification
- 17.0. Introduction
- 17.1. Restrictive and non-restrictive modifiers
- 17.2. Premodification
- 17.3. Postmodification
- 17.3.1. Adpositional phrases
- 17.3.2. Relative clauses
- 17.3.3. Infinitival clauses
- 17.3.4. A special case: clauses referring to a proposition
- 17.3.5. Adjectival phrases
- 17.3.6. Adverbial postmodification
- 17.4. Bibliographical notes
- 18 Projection of noun phrases III: Binominal constructions
- 18.0. Introduction
- 18.1. Binominal constructions without a preposition
- 18.2. Binominal constructions with a preposition
- 18.3. Bibliographical notes
- 19 Determiners: Articles and pronouns
- 19.0. Introduction
- 19.1. Articles
- 19.2. Pronouns
- 19.3. Bibliographical notes
- 20 Numerals and quantifiers
- 20.0. Introduction
- 20.1. Numerals
- 20.2. Quantifiers
- 20.2.1. Introduction
- 20.2.2. Universal quantifiers: ieder/elk ‘every’ and alle ‘all’
- 20.2.3. Existential quantifiers: sommige ‘some’ and enkele ‘some’
- 20.2.4. Degree quantifiers: veel ‘many/much’ and weinig ‘few/little’
- 20.2.5. Modification of quantifiers
- 20.2.6. A note on the adverbial use of degree quantifiers
- 20.3. Quantitative er constructions
- 20.4. Partitive and pseudo-partitive constructions
- 20.5. Bibliographical notes
- 21 Predeterminers
- 21.0. Introduction
- 21.1. The universal quantifier al ‘all’ and its alternants
- 21.2. The predeterminer heel ‘all/whole’
- 21.3. A note on focus particles
- 21.4. Bibliographical notes
- 22 Syntactic uses of noun phrases
- 23 Referential dependencies (binding)
- Syntax
-
- General
5.3.3.Cases of obligatory R-extraction
quickinfo
The previous sections have investigated the syntactic contexts that allow R-extraction. This does not mean that R-extraction must be applied in those cases. The examples in (101) show that the preposition can also be pied-piped by movement of the R-pronoun; in the primeless examples in (101), the preposition is stranded by the moved R-word, whereas in the primed examples the preposition is pied-piped.
101
| a. | Jan | heeft | daar/hier | de hele dag | naar | gezocht. | |
| Jan | has | there/here | the whole day | for | looked |
| a'. | Jan heeft daar/hier naar de hele dag gezocht. |
| b. | Daar/Hier heeft Jan de hele dag naar gezocht. |
| b'. | Daarnaar/Hiernaar heeft Jan de hele dag gezocht. |
This option of pied piping seems to be most common with demonstrative R-pronouns. As is shown in (102a), scrambling of the referential R-pronoun er must strand the preposition. The topicalization examples in (102b) are of course inconclusive, since topicalization of the unstressed R-pronoun er is excluded anyway.
102
| a. | Jan heeft | er | de hele dag | naar | gezocht. | |
| Jan has | there | the whole day | for | looked |
| a'. | * | Jan heeft ernaar de hele dag gezocht. |
| b. | * | Er heeft Jan de hele dag naar gezocht. |
| b'. | * | Ernaar heeft Jan de hele dag gezocht. |
The examples in (103) show that the interrogative and relative R-pronouns preferably strand the preposition; the primed, pied piping examples are acceptable, but marked with respect to the primeless, stranding examples.
103
| a. | Waar | heeft | Jan de hele dag | naar | gezocht? | |
| where | has | Jan the whole day | for | looked | ||
| 'What did Jan look for all day long?' | ||||||
| a'. | (?) | Waarnaar heeft Jan de hele dag gezocht? |
| b. | het pakje | waar | Jan de hele dag | naar | gezocht | heeft | |
| the parcel | where | Jan the whole day | for | looked | has | ||
| 'The parcel that Jan was looking for all day long.' | |||||||
| b''. | (?) | het pakje waarnaar Jan de hele dag gezocht heeft |
The examples in (104) and (105) show that scrambling and topicalization of quantified R-pronouns require, or at least strongly prefer, preposition stranding.
104
| a. | Jan heeft | overal | al | naar | gezocht. | |
| Jan has | everywhere | already | for | looked | ||
| 'Jan has already looked for everything.' | ||||||
| a'. | * | Jan heeft overal naar al gezocht. |
| b. | Overal heeft Jan al naar gezocht. |
| b'. | * | Overal naar heeft Jan al gezocht. |
105
| a. | Jan heeft | ergens/nergens | lang | naar | gezocht. | |
| Jan has | somewhere/nowhere | long | for | looked | ||
| 'Jan has looked for something a long time.' | ||||||
| a'. | * | Jan heeft ergens/nergens naar lang gezocht. |
| b. | Ergens/Nergens heeft Jan lang naar gezocht. |
| b'. | *Ergens/??Nergens naar heeft Jan lang gezocht. |
We therefore may conclude that, with the exception of the demonstrative R-pronouns daar and hier, movement of R-pronouns at least preferably strand the preposition; in some cases, pied piping of the preposition even leads to unacceptable results.
readmore
References:
Jump to:
X