Detailed overviews of nominalization in Dutch can be found in De Haas & Trommelen (1993) and Haeseryn et al. (1997:879ff.). For a discussion of restrictions on the input verb (especially unaccusative verbs) of deverbal constructions of various kinds, see Knopper (1984). For discussions of er-nominalizations, see Booij (1986a, 1986b), Hoekstra (1986) and De Caluwe (1992, 1995). Discussions of the behavior of inf and/or ing-nominalizations can be found in Ten Cate (1977), Van Haaften et al. (1985), Dik (1985a), Hoekstra & Wehrmann (1985), Hoekstra (1986), Looyenga (1990) and Schoorlemmer (2001), while Van den Hoek (1972) and Mackenzie (1985a) deal exclusively with ge-nominalizations. For a comparison of derivations with the affixes ge- and -erij, see Hüning (1992). Discussions of Dutch picture nouns can be found in Kaan (1992:§5), Vanden Wyngaerd (1994:§7) and De Wit (1997). Although they deal with English rather than Dutch, the following publications may also be of interest: Zucchi (1993), who deals with the syntax and semantics of nominalization; Mackenzie (1985b, 1986, 1990, 1996), who takes a functional view; and Fu et al. (2001) on process nominals. For a typological study of action nominals based on 70 languages (including Dutch), see Koptsjevskaja-Tamm (1993).

Detailed theoretical discussions of argument structure can be found in Williams (1981, 1994) and Grimshaw (1990). For a review of these and other more recent proposals, see also Alexiadou et al. (2007: part IV, chapter 1). For discussions of relational nouns and inalienable possession, the reader is referred to Fillmore (1968), Hawkins (1981), Löbner (1985), and Guéron (1985). Although none of these studies deals specifically with Dutch, they all contain material relevant to the Dutch noun phrase. Generative studies on the inheritance of arguments in Dutch include Hoekstra (1984a, 1986), Booij (1986a, 1988, 1992b), and Booij & Van Haaften (1987); Van der Putten (1997) takes a lexical approach, and Dik (1985a, 1985b) and Mackenzie (1985a, 1986) take a functional approach.

There is a large body of literature on extraction from the noun phrase. For the Dutch language, the reader is referred to Coppen (1991), Kaan (1992, §4), De Wit (1997), and Broekhuis (2016). Earlier studies on extraction include Kooij & Wiers (1977, 1978, 1979), Klein & Van der Toorn (1979), and De Haan (1979). Tests have also been developed for English to distinguish PP-complements from PP-modifiers; cf. Radford (1988), Fries (1999), and Huddleston & Pullum (2002). Discussions of extraction from English noun phrases in a generative context can be found in Guéron (1980), Baltin (1983, 1984), Culicover & Rochemont (1990), Rochemont & Culicover (1990) Davies & Dubinsky (2003), and Chomsky (2008).

References

Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman & Melita Stavrou. 2007. Noun phrases in the generative perspective. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Bach, Emmon & George M. Horn. 1976. Remarks on "Conditions on Transformations". Linguistic Inquiry 7: 265-299.

Baltin, Mark. 1983. Extraposition: bounding versus government and binding. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 155-163.

Baltin, Mark. 1984. Extraposition rules and discontinuous constituents. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 157-163.

Barbiers, Sjef. 1995. The syntax of interpretation. Leiden University/HIL: PhD thesis.

Booij, Geert. 1986a. ER als vormer van subjectsnamen: de verhouding tussen morfologie en syntaxis. Glot 9: 1-14.

Booij, Geert. 1986b. Form and meaning in morphology: the case of Dutch 'agent nouns'. Linguistics 24: 503-518.

Booij, Geert. 1992b. Morphology, semantics and argument structure. In Thematic structure: its role in grammar, ed. Iggy Roca, 47-64. Berlin/New York: Foris Publications.

Booij, Geert & Ton van Haaften. 1987. De externe syntaxis van afgeleide woorden. Spektator 16: 421-436.

Booij, Geert & Ton van Haaften. 1988. On the external syntax of derived words: evidence from Dutch. Yearbook of Morphology 1: 29-44.

Broekhuis, Hans. 2005. Extraction from subjects: some remarks on Chomsky's On Phases. In Organizing grammar. Linguistic studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, eds. Hans Broekhuis et al. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Broekhuis, Hans. 2016. Feature inheritance versus extended projections. In Optimality-theoretic syntax, semantics and pragmatics. From uni- to bidirectional optimization, 136-157. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language. Its nature, origin, and use. New York/Westport/London: Praeger.

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, eds. Robert Freidin et al., 133-166. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.

Coppen, Peter-Arno. 1991. Specifying the noun phrase. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.

Culicover, Peter W. & Michael Rochemont. 1990. Extraposition and the complement principle. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 33-47.

Davies, William & Stanley Dubinsky. 2003. On extraction from NPs. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21: 1-37.

De Caluwe, Johan. 1992. Deverbaal -er als polyseem suffix. Spektator 21: 137-148.

De Caluwe, Johan. 1995. Categoriale polysemie en familiegelijkenis: deverbaal -er revisited. Tabu 25: 3-13.

De Haan, Ger. 1979. Onafhankelijke PP-komplementen van nomina. Spektator 8: 330-339.

De Haas, Wim & Mieke Trommelen. 1993. Morfologisch handboek van het Nederlands: een overzicht van de woordvorming. 's-Gravenhage: SDU Uitgeverij.

De Wit, Petra. 1997. Genitive case and genitive constructions. Utrecht University: PhD thesis.

Dik, Simon C. 1985a. Nederlandse nominalisaties in een Functionele Grammatica. Forum der Letteren 26: 81-107.

Dik, Simon C. 1985b. Valentie en valentie-operaties in Functionele Grammatica. In Valentie in Functionele Grammatica. Interdisciplinair Tijdschrift voor Taal- en Tekstwetenschap 5/2, ed. Simon C. Dik, 95-114.

Fillmore, Charles. 1968. The case for case. In Universals in linguistic theory, eds. Emmon Bach and R.T. Harms, 1-88. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Fries, Peter. 1999. Postnominal modifiers in the noun phrase. In The clause in English, eds. Peter Collins and David Lee. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Fu, Jingqi, Thomas Roeper & Hagit Borer. 2001. The VP within process nominals: evidence from adverbs and the VP anaphor do-so. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19: 549-582.

Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Groefsema, Marjolein. 1995. Understood arguments: a semantic/pragmatic approach. Lingua 96: 139-162.

Guéron, Jacqueline. 1980. On the syntax and semantics of PP extraposition. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 637-678.

Guéron, Jacqueline. 1985. Inalienable possession, PRO-inclusion and lexical chains. In Grammatical representation, eds. Jacqueline Guéron et al., 43-86. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Haeseryn, Walter et al. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst, 2nd, revised edition. Groningen: Nijhoff.

Hawkins, R. 1981. Towards an explanation of the possessive constructions NPs' N and N of NP. Journal of linguistics 17: 247-269.

Hoeksema, Jack. 2013. Book review: Syntax of Dutch. Noun and Noun Phrases, volumes 1 and 2. Lingua: 385-390.

Hoekstra, Teun. 1984a. Transitivity. Grammatical relations in government-binding theory. Dordrecht/Cinnaminson: Foris Publications.

Hoekstra, Teun. 1986. Deverbalization and inheritance. Linguistics 24: 549-584.

Hoekstra, Teun. 1986. Overerving bij nomina agentis. Glot 9: 42-56.

Hoekstra, Teun & Pim Wehrmann. 1985. De nominale infinitief. Glot 8: 257-275.

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum (eds). 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hüning, Matthias. 1992. De concurrentie tussen deverbale nomina met ge- en op -erij. Spektator 21: 161-172.

Kaan, Edith. 1992. A minimalist approach to extraposition. University of Groningen: MA thesis.

Keijsper, C. 1985. Information structure. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Klein, M. & M.C. van den Toorn. 1979. Van NP-beperking to XP-beperking: een antwoord op Kooij en Wiers 1978. De Nieuwe Taalgids 72: 97-109.

Knopper, Rob. 1984. On the morphology of ergative verbs and the polyfunctionality principle. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1984, eds. Hans Bennis and W.U.S. Van Lessen Kloeke, 119-127. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Kooij, Jan & Evelyn Wiers. 1977. Vooropplaatsing van PPs in het Nederlands. Spektator 6: 445-449.

Kooij, Jan & Evelyn Wiers. 1978. Vooropplaatsing, verplaatsingsregels en interne structuur van nominale groepen. In Aspekten van woordvolgorde in het Nederlands, ed. Jan Kooij, 105-143. Leiden: Vakgroep Nederlandse Taal- & Letterkunde.

Kooij, Jan & Evelyn Wiers. 1979. Beperkingen en overschrijdingen: een antwoord aan Klein en Van den Toorn. De Nieuwe Taalgids 72: 488-493.

Koptsjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 1993. Nominalization. London: Routledge.

Koster, Jan. 1987. Domains and dynasties. The radical autonomy of syntax. Dordrecht/Providence: Foris Publications.

Löbner, Sebastian. 1985. Definites. Journal of Semantics 4: 279-326.

Looyenga, Sietze. 1990. On the internal structure of nominal infinitives. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1990, eds. Reineke Bok-Bennema and Peter Coopmans, 101-112. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Mackenzie, J.L. 1996. English nominalizations in the layered model of the sentence. In Complex structures: a functionalist perspective, eds. B. Devriendt et al., 325-356. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Mackenzie, Lachlan. 1985a. Genominaliseer. In Valentie in Functionele Grammatica. Interdisciplinair Tijdschrift voor Taal- en Tekstwetenschap 5/2, 177-198.

Mackenzie, Lachlan. 1985b. Nominalization and valency reduction. In Syntax and pragmatics in Functional Grammar, eds. A. Machtelt Bolkestein et al., 29-47. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Mackenzie, Lachlan. 1986. Aspects of nominalization in English and Dutch. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 15.

Mackenzie, Lachlan. 1990. First argument nominalization in a Functional Grammar of English. Linguistica Antverpiensia XXIV: 119-147.

Radford, Andrew. 1988. Transformational grammar: a first course. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rochemont, Michael. 1978. A theory of stylistic rules in English. New York: Garland Press.

Rochemont, Michael & Peter Culicover. 1990. English focus constructions and the theory of grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schoorlemmer, Maaike. 2001. Dutch nominalised infinitives as non-identical twins. UiL OTS Working Paper November 2001.

Ten Cate, A.P. 1977. -En of -ing: een kwestie van aspecten? Spektator 6: 395-401.

Van den Hoek, Theo. 1972. Ge-afleidingen en Chomsky's lexicalistische hypothese. Spektator 2: 405-420.

Van der Putten, Frans. 1997. Mind and matter in morphology. Syntactic and lexical deverbal morphology in Dutch. Leiden University: PhD thesis.

Van Haaften, Ton et al. 1985. Nominalisaties in het Nederlands. Glot 8: 67-104.

Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido. 1994. PRO-legomena. Distribution and Reference of infinitival subjects. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Verhagen, Arie. 1986. Linguistic theory and the function of word order in Dutch. A study on interpretive aspects of the order of adverbials and noun phrases. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Williams, Edwin. 1981. Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1: 81-114.

Williams, Edwin. 1994. Thematic structure in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Zucchi, Alessandro. 1993. The language of propositions and events: issues in the syntax and the semantics of nominalization. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.