• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Saterfrisian
  • Afrikaans
Show all
22.1.1.Syntactic functions of noun phrases
quickinfo

Noun phrases can occur in all argument functions. Some typical examples are given in (1) to (3). In (1) the noun phrases act as nominative subjects of the clause, in (2) as accusative direct objects, and in (3) as dative indirect objects. The examples in (4) show that they can also act as complements of a prepositional object: the primeless examples involve an indirect object and the primed ones the PP-complement op NP selected by the verb wachtento wait; similar examples could also be given for PPs with an adverbial function. The (a) and (b)-examples of each set illustrate non-neuter and neuter singulars, respectively, and the (c)-examples exemplify plurals. For each of these types, a definite and an indefinite example are given. The indefinite null article in plural noun phrases is indicated by ∅.

1
Subject
a. De man was afwezig.
  the man was absent
a'. Er was een man afwezig.
  there was a man absent
b. Het kind was afwezig.
  the child was absent
b'. Er was een kind afwezig.
  there was a child absent
c. De mensen waren afwezig.
  the people were absent
c'. Er waren [DP mensen] afwezig.
  there were people absent
2
Direct object
a. Hij genas de/een man.
  he healed the/a man
b. Hij genas het/een kind.
  he healed the/a child
c. Hij genas de/∅ mensen.
  he healed the/∅ people
3
Indirect object
a. Hij gaf de/een man nieuwe hoop.
  he gave the/a man new hope
b. Hij gaf het/een kind nieuwe hoop.
  he gave the/a child new hope
c. Hij gaf de/∅ mensen nieuwe hoop.
  he gave the/∅ people new hope
4
Complement of prepositional object
a. Hij gaf het boek aan de/een man.
  he gave the book to the/a man
a'. Jan wacht op de/een man.
  Jan waits for the/a man
b. Hij gaf het boek aan het/een kind.
  he gave the book to the/a child
b'. Jan wacht op het/een kind.
  Jan waits for the/a child
c. Hij gaf boeken aan de/?∅ mensen.
  he gave books to the/∅ people
c'. Jan wacht op de/??∅ mensen.
  Jan waits for the/∅ people

The definite noun phrases in (1) to (4) are headed by the definite article de/hetthe, but they can easily be replaced by any other type of definite noun phrase: replacing the noun phrase de manthe man by, e.g. noun phrases like die manthat man or mijn vriendmy friend, a personal pronoun like hij/hemhe/him, or a strong quantifier such as iedereeneveryone does not affect the acceptability judgments. Nor do the acceptability judgments change if we replace the indefinite singular noun phrase een man/kind by the existential quantifier iemandsomeone, or the bare indefinite plural DP [∅ mensen] persons by a plural indefinite noun phrase premodified by a cardinal numeral or a weak quantifier like verschillendeseveral or veelmany, as in vier/verschillende/veel mensen four/several/many persons’.

Two things stand out in the examples above. First, note that the plural indefinite noun phrases in the (c)-examples in (4) give rise to a marked result. This has to do with the fact that the indefinite noun phrase has a non-specific reading; when the plural noun phrase has a generic reading, as in (5), the result is fine.

5
a. Jan geeft graag aan goede doelen.
  Jan gives gladly to good causes
  'Jan likes to give to charity.'
b. Jan houdt van zebra’s.
  Jan is fond of zebras
  'Jan loves zebras.'

Second, the indefinite subjects in the primed examples in (1) usually occur in an expletive construction. This is also related to the fact that the indefinite noun phrase is construed non-generically. We will return to this issue in Section 22.1.4 below.

readmore
References:
    report errorprintcite